Every claim you publish is now contestable — in court, in audit, and in public.
RSPNSBL converts regulation into traceable requirements, governance, and audit-ready disclosures. From statute to claim. Defensible by construction.
Each engine answers one question. Each output becomes the next engine's input. Nothing freelances; nothing is opinion. From the regulation a company is subject to, all the way through to evidence packages a third-party verifier can sign — one traceable line.
Captures the structured profile of an organisation — identity, geography, sector (NACE), scale, operations, disclosures — and maps that profile against every applicable regulatory framework. The entry point of the chain. Without a clean PROFYLR record, nothing downstream is reliable.
A library of 340+ regulatory frameworks — every requirement linked to its primary legal source on EUR-Lex, every change tracked, every citation reproducible. The intelligence backbone of the platform.
Translates the requirement set into a board-ready governance capability blueprint — pillars, capabilities, KPIs, and the traceability appendix that ties every recommendation back to its legal source. The strategic output of the chain.
A deterministic transformation engine: requirements + governance + evidence in, structured disclosure objects out — across the fifteen-section disclosure schema covering CSRD/ESRS, ISSB, GRI, and proprietary trust frameworks.
Claims intelligence. Every public-facing environmental or governance claim assessed against ECGT criteria, mapped to its evidentiary basis, and scored against the standard a regulator or consumer authority would actually apply.
Supply-chain and supplier intelligence. Farmer-level and cooperative-level data — yields, poverty baselines, farm size, market prices, agronomy funds — sourced from USDA, FAOSTAT, PIP and direct supplier intake. The evidence layer for EUDR, CSDDD value-chain due diligence, and Scope 3 disclosures.
The assurance readiness engine. Translates ISO 17029, 17065, and CSRD assurance criteria into the governance evidence packages an external verifier actually uses — closing the gap between governance built and governance proven.
Most regulatory tools are LLMs writing about regulations. RSPNSBL is infrastructure that resolves regulations — every output a function of inputs you can audit, every assertion linked back to a primary legal source, every change in the law versioned and propagated through the chain.
No engine in the chain freelances. No model paraphrases. No answer is opinion. Every output is a function of structured inputs — the company profile, the applicable framework, the captured evidence — resolved against a versioned regulatory library. If two organisations with the same profile run the chain on the same date, they receive the same applicability map and the same governance blueprint. That is the contract.
The single hardest problem in multi-product governance software is keeping every surface aligned on what counts as what. RSPNSBL solves it structurally: a fixed classification of governance pillars and domains, defined once at the platform level and consumed by every engine in the chain — never duplicated, never drifting.
The four organising pillars under which every regulatory requirement is classified — whether it originates in CSRD, EUDR, EU AI Act, or ISO 17029. The pillar a requirement belongs to is determined deterministically from its content, not assigned by a curator and not invented by a model.
Sub-classifications inside the four pillars. Every requirement maps to exactly one domain. Domain assignment is the primary axis the platform uses to route obligations to the right capabilities, the right disclosures, and the right reviewers — without product-by-product divergence.
A single shared derivation engine converts requirement text into its capability, domain, and pillar assignments. Every engine in the chain consumes the same output. Cross-product consistency is a structural property of the platform — not something that has to be policed.
The library is built directly from the official publication channels of the European Union and complementary jurisdictional bodies. Nothing is paraphrased. Nothing is summarised by an intermediary. Every requirement carries its CELEX identifier and points back to the exact article on EUR-Lex.
Direct ingestion of EU legal acts from the official Publications Office — CELEX-linked, EuroVoc-tagged, version-tracked from publication.
Atomic, validated requirements extracted from regulatory source texts — each linked to its exact source quote.
CSRD, EUDR, CSDDD, ECGT, EU AI Act, NIS2, DORA, ISSB, GRI, ISO 17029/17065/14024 — fully extracted into requirements.
Company profiles in PROFYLR — each evaluated deterministically against the applicable framework set derived from its structured profile.
Every disclosure object the platform produces can be traced back, step by step, to the exact article of EU law that requires it. Below: a worked example of the trace for a CSRD ESRS E1 climate-transition disclosure — the shape of the trace the platform produces for every disclosure object.
A regulator will ask: where does this come from, who is obliged to say it, and what evidence sits behind it. The live platform answers that question against your specific organisational profile. Below is an illustrative walk-through on three pre-worked claims — a demonstration of the shape of the answer, not the answer itself.
Six gates built into the platform's architecture — not its marketing. Each is enforced at the database or engine layer, not in UI code. If a gate fails, the chain refuses to advance.
Every regulatory requirement entering the library is validated at the point of entry against quality gates covering completeness, specificity, actor identification, and evidence grounding. Failed records do not reach downstream engines.
Evidence is only surfaced to downstream products once it clears a calibrated qualification threshold or has been explicitly reviewed. Unqualified evidence is excluded from blueprints, disclosures, and claims assessments.
Review decisions, ingestion events, capability reviews and applicability audits are recorded permanently. Records cannot be silently mutated. The full history of how data entered the platform and how it was assessed is preserved.
Governance capability assignment uses no stochastic model. Same input, same output, every time. Outputs are reproducible and auditable across the engines in the chain.
Each engine owns a specific layer of the governance intelligence pipeline. Data flows forward through the chain — no engine writes backwards into another engine's canonical records. Boundaries are enforced structurally.
Every disclosure traces to a requirement. Every requirement traces to a source legal text via exact quotation and reference. Every evidence mapping traces to a specific document excerpt with page and passage.
The ontology layer is jurisdiction-agnostic by construction. EuroVoc handles EU law today; USC/CFR handles US federal law tomorrow; legislation.gov.uk handles UK law after that. SKOS and LKIF do not change. Every jurisdiction added compounds the moat — because the engines, reviewers, and audit guarantees stay constant while the regulatory surface area expands.
Three problems that no checklist tool, no consultancy deck, and no generic LLM can solve — because the answer is structural, not advisory.
CSRD, EUDR, CSDDD, ECGT, EU AI Act, ISSB and ISO frameworks all overlap and reference each other. RSPNSBL holds the dependency graph and resolves the overlap deterministically — not as opinion.
Regulators, consumer authorities, and assurance bodies now expect the line from claim back to source to be reproducible. RSPNSBL is built to be that line — not a way to write around it.
Most organisations with substantial governance investment are not assurance-ready. Their evidence is real but not organised in the form independent verification requires. CERTEFAI closes that gap.
The EU regulatory architecture has reached a phase where waiting is the most expensive choice an obligated organisation can make.
All environmental claims to EU consumers must be substantiated under the Empowering Consumers for the Green Transition Directive. Penalties up to 4% of annual turnover.
Omnibus I narrowed CSRD to organisations with 1,000+ employees AND €450M+ turnover. Smaller obligation, tighter discipline expected. CSDDD thresholds 5,000 / €1.5B.
Across 25 frameworks fully extracted into atomic, source-linked requirements: CSRD, EUDR, CSDDD, ECGT, EU AI Act, NIS2, DORA, ISSB, GRI, ISO 17029/17065/14024.
RSPNSBL is the productised form of a system its founder has been building — in the field, across continents — for more than a decade. The platform reflects what works when regulation, technology, and operations collide at scale, in markets where those three things rarely align.
Ketan builds the systems that turn sustainability promises into something regulators trust, companies can operate, and producers can live with — particularly in markets where infrastructure, regulation, and on-the-ground realities rarely align.
At Enveritas he leads operations, certification, and machine-learning teams working across 38 countries — integrating field teams, satellite monitoring, and AI-driven analytics into one operational system, and ensuring the resulting data is credible enough for audits, certification decisions, and emerging regulatory frameworks including EUDR, ECGT, and CSRD/CSDDD.
He led Enveritas through ISO/IEC 17065 accreditation, establishing a certification body trusted by regulators and multinational companies. Across more than 40 countries he works with companies, governments, and development agencies to implement systems that survive contact with real markets.
Most useful where regulation, technology, and operations collide — particularly when organisations need credibility, not just strategy.
The assurance industry is moving from periodic audits to continuous, data-driven verification. Sustainability data is being asked to carry the same weight as financial or safety data — with the same scrutiny, the same defensibility, the same audit trail.
RSPNSBL is what that shift looks like as infrastructure. Built by someone whose operational career has been, for more than a decade, designing exactly these systems — for real producers, in real supply chains, against real regulators.
A place reserved here for the words of a named assessor. Out of respect for the substance of independent critique, we will wait for that critique to be earned rather than solicited.
A 30-second indicative walk-through of the kind of applicability resolution the live platform performs — run against eight of the most consequential EU frameworks. This is a demonstration, not a live assessment. The production PROFYLR engine runs against the platform's complete framework library with fully calibrated applicability logic.
Different visitors are solving different problems. Tell us which one, and we will respond with something actually useful.